Meredith Ringel Morris: Generative AI's HCI Moment
Human-centred AI design research from a leading practitioner surfaces ethical and UX considerations relevant to APS AI deployment decisions.
Key points
- Google DeepMind's human-AI interaction research director discusses HCI, disability studies, and generative AI design.
- Topics include AI anthropomorphisation, AGI definitions, consent for generative 'ghost' systems, and bidirectional alignment.
- Academic podcast format with limited direct policy or governance takeaways for APS practitioners.
Summary
The Gradient podcast features Meredith Ringel Morris, Director for Human-AI Interaction Research at Google DeepMind, discussing the intersection of AI and human-computer interaction. Topics span disability studies and AI bias, the ethical and psychological dimensions of 'generative ghosts' (AI systems trained on deceased individuals), anthropomorphisation, AGI definitions, and bidirectional human-AI alignment. The conversation is academic and wide-ranging rather than policy-focused, with relevance to agencies thinking about accessible, human-centred AI design and the emerging ethics of AI personhood.
Implications for Australian agencies
- Monitor Agencies developing human-centred AI guidance or accessibility frameworks may want to monitor the HCI research literature this conversation references, particularly on disability and AI bias.
Implications are AI-generated. Starting points, not advice.
"Meredith Ringel Morris: Generative AI's HCI Moment" Source: The Gradient – Substack Published: 12 September 2024 URL: https://thegradientpub.substack.com/p/meredith-morris-generative-ai-hci The Gradient podcast features Meredith Ringel Morris, Director for Human-AI Interaction Research at Google DeepMind, discussing the intersection of AI and human-computer interaction. Topics span disability studies and AI bias, the ethical and psychological dimensions of 'generative ghosts' (AI systems trained on deceased individuals), anthropomorphisation, AGI definitions, and bidirectional human-AI alignment. The conversation is academic and wide-ranging rather than policy-focused, with relevance to agencies thinking about accessible, human-centred AI design and the emerging ethics of AI personhood. Implications for Australian agencies: - [Monitor] Agencies developing human-centred AI guidance or accessibility frameworks may want to monitor the HCI research literature this conversation references, particularly on disability and AI bias. Retrieved from SIMS, 18 May 2026.