Musk v. Altman week 2: OpenAI fires back, and Shivon Zilis reveals that Musk tried to poach Sam Altman
US courtroom testimony about OpenAI's founding disputes - background context only, no APS policy angle.
Key points
- Ongoing US court case surfaces 2017 internal OpenAI disputes over equity and control of AGI development.
- Testimony describes Musk seeking majority equity, board control, and CEO role at a for-profit OpenAI.
- Corporate litigation drama with minimal direct relevance to Australian AI governance or APS practice.
View original source
Copied.
"Musk v. Altman week 2: OpenAI fires back, and Shivon Zilis reveals that Musk tried to poach Sam Altman"
Source: MIT Technology Review – AI
Published: 8 May 2026
URL: https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/05/08/1137008/musk-v-altman-week-2-openai-fires-back-and-shivon-zilis-reveals-that-musk-tried-to-poach-sam-altman/
Week two of the Musk v. Altman litigation in the US has produced courtroom testimony from OpenAI cofounder Greg Brockman detailing 2017 negotiations over OpenAI's for-profit structure. Brockman described Musk seeking majority equity, board control, and the CEO role, and recounted a confrontational meeting that ended with Musk walking out. The testimony portrays a core tension over who would hold control over any AGI OpenAI might develop. The case is ongoing; this coverage is primarily corporate drama with no immediate regulatory or policy implications for Australian agencies.
Retrieved from SIMS, 18 July 2026.