Item Catalogue

AI governance, regulation, strategy, and practice developments from monitored sources.

Last updated 2 Jul 2026, 04:12 PM AEST
Clear
Saved (0)
Filters 1 active
Jurisdiction
Category
Source (1)

Date range

primary source commentary 12 items

Week of 29 June 2026

Centre for AI Safety – Blog(Global) 2 Jul 2026 52

A Significant Increase in Digital Labor Automation

The Remote Labor Index shows AI automation of freelance professional work rose from 2.5% to 16.1% in under eight months.

Key points
  • Benchmark covers economically valuable tasks - 3D design, video, architecture, data analysis - relevant to APS workforce planning.
  • Automated LLM judges overstate frontier model capability by 2-3x, reinforcing the need for human evaluation in AI assurance.

Week of 4 May 2026

Centre for AI Safety – Blog(Global) 9 May 2026 58

The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning

CAIS releases WMDP, a 4,157-question benchmark measuring hazardous AI knowledge in biosecurity, cybersecurity, and chemical security.

Key points
  • Accompanying 'CUT' unlearning method removes hazardous knowledge from LLMs while preserving general capabilities, resisting jailbreaking.
  • Benchmark and method are research outputs; no direct Australian regulatory mandate is attached to their adoption.
Centre for AI Safety – Blog(Global) 9 May 2026 52

AI Safety, Ethics, and Society

Centre for AI Safety has published a free interdisciplinary textbook covering AI safety, ethics, and governance.

Key points
  • The course targets non-technical audiences including policy professionals - accessible to APS practitioners without ML background.
  • The 2024 course application deadline has passed; the textbook remains freely available online as a reference resource.
Centre for AI Safety – Blog(Global) 9 May 2026 52

Biosecurity and AI: Risks and Opportunities

AI capabilities in protein design, DNA synthesis guidance, and multimodal coaching substantially lower bioterrorism barriers.

Key points
  • Proposed mitigations include sequence screening, access controls on biotech AI tools, and chatbot knowledge exclusions.
  • Undated think-tank piece; no Australian-specific content, but biosecurity-AI overlap is increasingly active in international policy forums.
Centre for AI Safety – Blog(Global) 9 May 2026 52

Cybersecurity and AI: The Evolving Security Landscape

AI is accelerating both cyberattack sophistication and scale, with non-state actors increasingly empowered to target critical infrastructure.

Key points
  • Structural deficiencies in patch management, legacy systems, and security culture mean defensive AI benefits may not be realised in practice.
  • Primarily a US-focused think-tank explainer; useful framing but limited direct APS policy or operational specificity.
Centre for AI Safety – Blog(Global) 9 May 2026 48

Existing Policy Proposals Targeting Present and Future Harms

Centre for AI Safety outlines three existing policy proposals it believes advance AI safety: legal liability, regulatory scrutiny, and human oversight.

Key points
  • The piece argues overlap exists between AI safety researchers and fairness/accountability/transparency advocates - useful framing for APS consensus-building.
  • This is an undated, short position piece from a US think tank; it predates recent major regulatory developments including the EU AI Act's passage.
Centre for AI Safety – Blog(Global) 9 May 2026 48

Representation Engineering: a New Way of Understanding Models

CAIS research introduces 'representation engineering' to identify and control honesty, power-seeking, and morality in LLMs.

Key points
  • The technique manipulates internal model activations to make models more or less honest - a transparency and control advance.
  • This is foundational AI safety research; no immediate APS operational application, but relevant to longer-term AI assurance thinking.
Centre for AI Safety – Blog(Global) 9 May 2026 42

Superhuman Automated Forecasting

Centre for AI Safety's FiveThirtyNine bot matches crowd-level forecasting accuracy on 177 Metaculus questions using GPT-4o.

Key points
  • The post argues AI forecasting bots could help policymakers reduce bias and improve decision-making on complex topics.
  • Automation bias, tail-risk neglect, and lack of fine-tuning are flagged limitations relevant to any government deployment context.
Centre for AI Safety – Blog(Global) 9 May 2026 38

Devising ML Metrics

CAIS blog post by Dan Hendrycks outlines principles for designing effective ML evaluation benchmarks.

Key points
  • Benchmark design shapes which AI capabilities get measured and improved - relevant to AI assurance and evaluation work.
  • Practical guidance targets ML researchers; limited direct applicability to APS governance or policy practitioners.
Centre for AI Safety – Blog(Global) 9 May 2026 38

Submit Your Toughest Questions for Humanity's Last Exam

CAIS and Scale AI are crowdsourcing expert-level questions to build a frontier AI capability benchmark called Humanity's Last Exam.

Key points
  • The project addresses benchmark saturation - top AI models now near-ceiling existing tests like MMLU.
  • This item is a call for submissions with a November 2024 deadline - likely already closed, limiting immediate relevance.
Centre for AI Safety – Blog(US) 9 May 2026 35

Leading AI Companies Join White House's Voluntary Commitment to Enhance AI Safety

Seven leading AI companies made voluntary White House commitments on safety, including red-teaming and information sharing.

Key points
  • CAIS frames these commitments as a stepping stone toward binding regulatory obligations - not an endpoint.
  • This item appears undated and likely reflects the July 2023 White House voluntary commitments - now superseded by subsequent US developments.
Centre for AI Safety – Blog(Global) 9 May 2026 32

A Bird's Eye View of the ML Field

CAIS blog post explains structural dynamics of ML research: metrics, creative destruction, and conference incentives.

Key points
  • Argues that safety-relevant research ecosystems, datasets, and culture survive paradigm shifts better than specific methods.
  • Foundational orientation piece for AI safety researchers; limited direct operational relevance for APS practitioners.